Can They Lie?

Historical and artistic truth

Ornate decoration of flying buttresses

Outside the Cathedral of Reims, October 2014

Reading time: 2 minutes

Bad configuration of Message to Display in Plugin parameters.

A Warning

This is going to stay simple. Simplistic, actually.

Framing the issue

We should enjoy historical novels and films without getting into the annoying and unimportant sideshow of whether or not something happened - or whether it happened a certain way.

History and the novel, separately

Historians research primary sources, ask questions, and arrive at conclusions (or ask more questions), but they must do so in good faith within the historical record.

Novelists of any type have no such constraints. A novel has invented characters, invented stories, invented dialog, and no obligation to tell the truth.

Black and white photo of church bombed and soldiers walking around

History: truth, reality, facts. Photo by British Library (Mods)

Shelves of books

The novel: invention, entertainment, didacticism. Photo by Dakota Corbin (Mods)

The historical novel

None of that freedom changes for historical novelists.

In a historical novel - a work of fiction set fifty or more years ago - novelists are still free to employ poetic license, choose the ending they want, and alter facts so that the resolution is more satisfying. They can even bend history to create an "alternate" historical novel.

For historians, therefore, a historical novel is simply a lie. It might be a pleasant lie they enjoy reading - but it's still a lie.

Artistic truth protects the novelist from historical truth.

Truth(s)

Since everything about a historical novel is a lie, there is nothing wrong, unethical, or damning about changing history in it. A nip and tuck, or a wholesale re-write: it's all fair game. Until we get to the resolution - where judgment can and should occur - the reader has no right to insist on historical accuracy or purity.

And why is that?

Because artistic truth protects the novelist from historical truth.

Have you ever seen a TV show or movie where lovers wake up in the morning and immediately begin talking close and kissing?

Couple in bed, up close

Don't they need to go to the bathroom? Do they have morning breath? Photo by Toa Heftiba (Mods)

When actual human beings wake up, they need to pee and brush their teeth before interacting with anyone. Despite this nearly universal truth, showing every detail of a morning trip to the bathroom would be an unnecessary, clunky interruption to the story. A bathroom break only teaches us the characters are people with physical needs. Not exactly groundbreaking.

The point is: reality can get in the way of a story.

It's the same for a historical novel.

Historical reality isn't always neat and tidy. It's not all battles, speeches, and parades that move in a straight line and make perfect sense. Historical events can be mundane, tedious, confusing, and, sometimes, completely unbelievable.

A bathroom break only teaches us that the characters are people with physical needs. Not exactly groundbreaking.

They own it!

Just like the lovers in a movie who don't pee or brush their teeth, some historical details are so boring, random, or weird that they would kill a story if they were included as they happened. The historical novelist often has to change the past to make a cleaner, tighter story - or to make a specific point.

There is a consequence to such liberty, however. Historical novelists' work is exactly what they've chosen it to be. They own the historical, political, social, and moral results of their agenda.

In other words, historical novelists can make all the changes they like, but a historically engaged reader is obligated to understand and pass judgment on those changes - and their conclusion.

Historians hold up a mirror to the past. Historical novelists hold up a mirror to themselves.

Read about my historical novel, The Sacred Lily, here.

Read more

Archive

About

A smiling Francis and me, sitting outside in front of some shrubs

Some basics

A brief biographical sketch

Me on top of a sunny Mt Pilatus in Switzerland, with mountains in the background

Travel

Pardon the saccharine and the obvious, but travel is everything

A couple standing in front of a large Gothic church, on a bridge over the Seine

France

France deserves its own section

Francis, as a two year-old in a car seat, in sunglasses reading a French picture book

Reading

The bullshit of daily life? I'd rather read.

Stage with musicians going at it - they're Gogol Bordello, and they're crazy

Music

Let me take you back

Little boy sitting on a big white bed, looking at a tablet

Television

I watch a lot more television than movies

Live action from a soccer game at Crew Stadium - yellow versus blue

Soccer

The only sport that matters

Ugly photo of a pig knuckle after it's been eaten - really, it looks horrible

Food

As a travel writer, I have to talk about food

Me in an outdoor restaurant drinking from a green coconut with a long straw

Dumb stuff

You will not feel smarter after reading this

Dumpster full of garbage

Minimalism

Trying to live simply

Me getting out of a red Ferrari F430 with a guy clapping for me

Other Interests

I've only driven a Ferrari once

Dude wearing orange pants and orange and green shoes walking on wet grass

Get off my lawn

A few brief rants

Recent Instagram Posts

Recent Tweets